Alexander Gromnitsky's Blog

Comanches vs. Texians

Latest update:

'The average Indian could ride rings around the average mounted white. Worse yet, the American weapons were not designed for horse combat. The Kentucky rifle and the tomahawk were woodland weapons. The long flintlocks (percussion caps began to come into use about 1820) were awkward tools in the saddle; they lost their accuracy, and could not be recharged easily. In the time it took a frontiersman to reload, a Comanche could charge three hundred yards and shoot twenty arrows. In a country without trees to hide behind, the whites were outclassed.

'When whites engaged Comanches, they had to dismount and make a stand, firing some of their pieces to hold the Indians off, but always keeping some loaded rifles in reserve against a charge by what was the best light cavalry in the 19th-century world. Many Americans were saved, not by the stubbornness of their defense but by the fact that it was against Indian sensibilities and tactics to push an attack home. The best the Americans could achieve with their single-shot rifles was a standoff. If they ran, however, they were doomed, unless they quickly found timber or rock. Frontier manuals and books were emphatic, in detail, against trying to outrun Comanches; when the enemy fled, it brought out the hunting and killing instinct, and the Comanche was splendidly armed, with the bow, to kill fleeing horsemen during pursuit.'

(From Lone Star: A History of Texas And the Texans, ch. 25 by T. R. Fehrenbach.)

Comanches


Tags: quote, usa
Authors: ag